Ground Zero Monologues

12/17/20: INOCULOUS – PUTTING THE NEEDLE IN THE RED W/ RONNIE MCMULLEN

todayDecember 17, 2020 199 1

Background
share close

MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS

When I criticize the media for shaping public opinion instead of reporting on it, I guess I don’t make it clear enough that I look at all networks with disdain when they do this. I get fed up with any media network that enables ignorance and stupidity or feigns a certain bias and sensitivity to issues that really aren’t there, but they most certainly want you to think there is an issue.

I have stated over and over again that the media anymore observes or reports a so-called crisis, then awaits a reaction and at times reports that the government has a solution.

It is Hegelian – where the problem demands reaction, and the only solution is that which is ready for its close up on national TV. The sexy expert must speak, and the doctors of the diabolical are there to tell you what to do as if we are little children that are lost and are in need of direction.

We have heard the slogan “facts before fear” as id the facts they give you are simply an excuse to be fearful or victimized –what is happening in that the news has become a well of information to terrorize you into submission.

As Dark Winter brings its cold and unforgiving storms and the lockdowns successfully keep us indoors As the temperatures drop, Americans find themselves in front of the TV a lot more and so they are exposed to hyper-reality from dramas and situation comedies. While much of what we see is mindless entertainment, there is now a trend for the liberal leaning networks to go back and rewrite history in order to push hidden agendas.

Around this time of year, I used to laugh at conservative commentators like Bill O’Reilly and others who always dragged on and on about a war on Christmas. I always said that I will believe that there is a war on Christmas when the government decides to cancel it.

Well, it is 2020 and I am not laughing anymore – Christmas, according to the experts, should be cancelled.

Dr. Anthony Fauci declared this week that he believes Christmas celebrations between family members should be canceled, warning that it’s “just one of the things you’re going to have to accept as we go through this unprecedented challenging time.”

Fauci made the comments in an interview with the Washington Post, noting that over the holidays “I’m going to be with my wife — period.”

“The Christmas holiday is a special holiday for us because Christmas Eve is my birthday. And Christmas Day is Christmas Day.” Fauci said, adding “And [my daughters] are not going to come home … That’s painful.” Fauci urged that Christmas get togethers must be curbed because “We have a big problem. Look at the numbers — the numbers are really quite dramatic.”

“Stay at home as much as you can, keep your interactions to the extent possible to members of the same household,” he added. “This cannot be business as usual this Christmas because we’re already in a very difficult situation, and we’re going to make it worse, if we don’t do something about it,” Fauci further declared.

Fauci also complained that the “independent spirit in the United States of people not wanting to comply with public health measures has certainly hurt us a bit.”

“There are people in various parts of the country who still believe that [COVID-19] is a hoax, that it’s fake – even when in their own state the hospitals have been overrun with patients in the hospital beds and in the intensive care unit,” Fauci said, adding “That’s very unusual to see a situation like that, but that is what is going on in this country.”

I remember the story of the first Lady Melania Trump being criticized because in a phone call to one of her so called friends she complained that she just didn’t like all of the hassles of Christmas.. but one thing she did not do is encourage people not to celebrate it.

Last week, Fauci declared that face masks and distancing restrictions are here to stay unless enough Americans get the coronavirus vaccination, and even then it will take at least six months before the masks can be left behind.

I remember when I was first diagnosed with kidney cancer – I was told by one doctor what he recommended for me to do. I was then told that I should also get a second opinion from another doctor. However, now there is no second opinion because those opinions are silenced in order to continue this terrorizing and depressing agenda that the so called experts believe we deserve.

On this occasion of Christmas, it isn’t Krampus that will give you nightmares but death that seems to be dogging outside your door.

Why, in the midst of a genuine pandemic, would anyone need to be reminded unceasingly that death is dogging their footsteps? That at any moment The Virus, wafted abroad by some super-spreader passed fleetingly in the street, might be insinuating itself into one’s body – or, worse, that we ourselves, infected but unaffected, might be silently contaminating a loved-one?

The short answer is, they wouldn’t. In a genuine pandemic, this constant mental battering would be redundant. If the Black Death were raging outside my door, government would know full well that they didn’t have to fork out millions to convince me to stay inside; more likely, they would have to pay me to leave the house.

Yet this government has bought the mass media lock, stock and barrel, at vast expense, with the sole purpose, it seems, of hammering home a message of impending doom. Instead of calming our fears with facts and rational arguments, they have seen fit to flood the airwaves with slogans calculated to maintain panic; with disingenuous appeals to the emotions; with out-of-context death counts, willful obfuscation of the difference between cases and infections, a criminally dodgy PCR test and graphs and computer models (rubbish in, rubbish out) carefully selected to emphasize the worst possible eventualities.

Why are they doing this?  Surely, by now, they must be aware that increasing numbers of highly esteemed and experienced scientists contest policies which are killing vastly more people than they are saving, and which will go on killing well into the future! 

Non-scientists like you and me could get lost in all the reams of conflicting information churned out since we were first put-on terror alert back in February and March.

I get the feeling that this is by design.

As I reported the other night, a very controversial television program that aired on Amazon called, Utopia, had been cancelled after one season.

Utopia is about a group of conspiracy nerds who meet online, and wind up mercilessly hunted by a shadowy deep state organization after they come into possession of a near-mythical cult underground comic book. Within the comic’s pages, they discover a conspiracy theory about a plague set into motion by a man called Mr. Rabbit. Mr. Rabbit designs the virus, exposes children to it and then designs a vaccine that when administered starts a chain reaction that leads to a devastating end game.

This fictional TV show was based on a British version that aired years before the pandemic. It was so controversial and close to real life events that it had to have a disclaimer before it aired.

We certainly do not want a fictitious TV show literally giving away the plan that the elites are carrying out. We can’t even speculate that this Dragon of COVID-19 wasn’t created for political profit by elite Malthusian rabbits like Bill Gates in order to terrorize people into taking something that might harm them.

But no, we are being told that only mass vaccination against this virus will allow us to return to any semblance of normal life. By special dispensation, millions of doses of insufficiently tested vaccine are already in the pipeline, with a guarantee of no come-back for Big Pharma or for doctors turning a blind eye to the precept “First to do no harm”, should those treated be hit with damaging repercussions on their health or, indeed, on life itself.

The other night we played you an interview with Bill gates where he said it would not be out of the question that nearly 700,000 people would suffer side effects from this new vaccine.

CNN also reported that we should not be alarmed if it is reported that people are dying from getting the vaccine –again passed off as normal and maybe it is because many people will suffer complications from side effects and allergies.

CNN reported that “deaths may occur that won’t necessarily have anything to do with the vaccine.”

The advisory appeared in an article titled ‘Why vaccinate our most frail? Odd vote out shows the dilemma’ in which Dr. Kelly Moore, associate director of the Immunization Action Coalition, cautions that vaccines don’t work as well on the frail and elderly compared to healthy people.

“When shots begin to go into arms of residents, Moore said Americans need to understand that deaths may occur that won’t necessarily have anything to do with the vaccine,” states the report.

“We would not at all be surprised to see, coincidentally, vaccination happening and then having someone pass away a short time after they receive a vaccine, not because it has anything to do with the vaccination but just because that’s the place where people at the end of their lives reside,” Moore said.

She then said Americans shouldn’t be alarmed to see people dying a day or two after receiving the COVID vaccination.

“One of the things we want to make sure people understand is that they should not be unnecessarily alarmed if there are reports, once we start vaccinating, of someone or multiple people dying within a day or two of their vaccination who are residents of a long-term care facility. That would be something we would expect, as a normal occurrence, because people die frequently in nursing homes.”

While deaths in care homes of people who take the vaccine are described as normal and nothing to do with the vaccine, some would suggest that you could make the exact same argument about deaths of those with multiple comorbidities in care homes that were put down to COVID.

Many have and have been shouted down for doing so.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration staff recommends monitoring people who get Pfizer or Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine shots for possible cases of Bell’s palsy, saying it’s not necessarily a side effect but worth watching out for after a handful of trial participants got the condition, which causes half of your face to droop.

Two health care workers at the same hospital in Alaska developed concerning reactions just minutes after receiving Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine this week, including one staff member who was to remain hospitalized so other doctors can monitor the situation.

Health officials said that the cases would not disrupt their vaccine roll-out plans and that they were sharing the information for the sake of transparency.

The first worker, a middle-aged woman who had no history of allergies, had an anaphylactic reaction that began 10 minutes after receiving the vaccine at Bartlett Regional Hospital in Juneau on Tuesday, a hospital official said. She experienced a rash over her face and torso, shortness of breath and an elevated heart rate.

Dr. Lindy Jones, the hospital’s emergency department medical director, said the worker was first given a shot of epinephrine, a standard treatment for severe allergic reactions. Her symptoms subsided but then re-emerged, and she was treated with steroids and an epinephrine drip.

When doctors tried to stop the drip, her symptoms re-emerged yet again, so the woman was moved to the intensive care unit, observed throughout the night, then weaned off the drip early Wednesday morning, Dr. Jones said.

While I would say that allergic reactions are academic the idea that the vaccine works in short term intervals makes me wonder if we will be needing booster shots until we die.

Are the young and healthy facing a lifetime of booster shots against a disease that is dangerous almost exclusively to the old and sick? And if this isn’t crazy enough, we are being told that, even while being turned into human pin-cushions, we will probably need to go on wearing masks and holding our friends and family at arm’s length well into the future: a future, it is hinted, of health passports and routine mass surveillance, if we wish to travel on public transport or generally engage in life beyond our doorstep.

This, it seems, will be the New Normal – but not to worry! After all, you’re already masking up automatically when you leave the house, aren’t you, and following the one-way footsteps on the pavement as a matter of course? And if it becomes too much of a nuisance to carry your proof of vaccination around with you, well, we should soon be able to offer you the trouble-free alternative of an implanted microchip, to cover all eventualities: health; finance; your social credit score.

People who wish to engage in alternatives to protect themselves are shouted down and ridiculed –and yet people are not seeing that this is all about political control and that a potentially deadly disease is being overtly exploited and people are just playing along out of fear.

We live in a world that has always been threatening and violent but we are never told to be afraid of everything around us and we are getting death tolls as if they are weather reports.

There was an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal that surprised me and actually started to push the conversation into the possibility that a lot of what we have been told about COVID-19 was and still is political.

It actually was based on a paper that was submitted to the COVID-19 research center opining that politics got in the way of actually using Hydroxychloroquine to help patients with COVID-19.

While the journal entry did point out that benefits in some cases were minimal – they do state that politics got in the way of further studies where many patients did respond to it and to some benefit.

The reason hydroxychloroquine was dismissed in the media was because of political wrangling by President Trump and the notion that it was seen as a cure or that it was reported in the media that Trump touted it as a cure, – it was not a cure but it helped many patients during treatment. It received such a bad reputations that most doctors avoided using it when it could have helped some patients during recovery.

The paper concludes that The clear, unambiguous, and compelling lesson from the hydroxychloroquine story for the medical community and the public is that science and politics do not mix. Science, by definition, requires diligence and an honest assessment of findings; politics not so much. The number of articles in the peer-reviewed literature over the last several months that have consistently and convincingly demonstrated the lack of efficacy of a highly hyped “cure” for COVID-19 represent the consequence of the irresponsible infusion of politics into the world of scientific evidence and discourse.

The science as they call it is purely political agenda – science has no part in it.

It is becoming clear that anyone who uses the term “the science” is not aware of the many options there are with modern medicine.

The science is not going to discourage you from taking a potentially harmful vaccine – in fact, they are telling you to expect that people will either die or become harmed by it.

However, we are told that we us must live in a world where our own perceptions are remorselessly challenged by the prevailing lie.  Guided by rational thought processes and the evidence, we know that we are at no more risk from COVID-19 this year than we were in previous years from one of the more aggressive strains of influenza, but as soon as we venture into the outside world, everything contradicts our inner reality: and though we may not participate actively in the masquerade, we are condemned to a perpetual state of cognitive dissonance, compelled to acquiesce silently in the grand illusion being played out all around us, under the direction of the government and their paid political experts.

If it were ever possible to put the enormities which have taken place since last March down to mere blundering, it certainly is not now.  The argument that the government has simply blundered and is now trying to save face is now evident with the panacea of the vaccine.

Everything is better now – or so they will have you think, meanwhile you are being told that you should avoid any of the joy that comes with Christmas.

Get ready for the innocuous modification of the propaganda and how gratuitously leaders who levied their draconian restrictions will take credit for the miracle cure.

As countries throughout the world commit consensual suicide to a rousing chorus of the Great Reset’s motto “Build Back Better,” people with common sense shake their heads in puzzlement, that so many nations, with one accord, should not only have made exactly the same mistakes earlier this year, but are now insisting, in unison that they have saved the day with a vaccine that has the potential to be worse that the disease itself.

The post 12/17/20: INOCULOUS – PUTTING THE NEEDLE IN THE RED W/ RONNIE MCMULLEN appeared first on Ground Zero with Clyde Lewis.

Written by: Rob Daven

Rate it

Previous post

Ground Zero Monologues

12/16/20: CYBER COUP D’ETAT W/ JAMES PONDER

MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS You can make the argument that most conspiracy theories are made not for the moment but as portents to what is going to happen months or years from when they were first made. That is the frustrating part of doing a show like Ground Zero. One can accuse me of not covering current events but my argument is that I do – it is just […]

todayDecember 16, 2020 271 4 3

Post comments (0)

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


0%