Many South East Asian countries have used audio, video, and text propaganda, in order to change people’s minds about many issues and now that COVID-19 has become a world issue, health and diet are of extreme importance.
This has created a whole new method of psychological warfare where food and drugs are weaponized and even banned, they are then replaced by government approved food stuffs– many are genetically modified or created in a lab.
Many worry that this trend is also going to come to America to be part of what is called the Codex Alimentarius.

The new Codex Alimentarius plan that was proposed in 2015 during the 2030 summit where the United Nation’s stated that there should be dietary guidelines in place for the entire world which includes the regulations of animal based proteins.
For the past 3 years there has been a push by Climate Change adherents to limit or even ban the eating of dairy and beef products – there was a trend on social media of what is called steak and dairy shaming of people saying that it harms the environment.
Before the Climate debate was replaced with the COVID-19 debate ,there was a push for the 2030 ideal diet proposed by the technocrats which literally limits and then virtually eliminates animal proteins from the human diet.
The thing that is most disconcerting is at least one in five people could not afford science’s ‘ideal diet’ designed to feed 10 billion people without hurting the planet, according to a study.
It recommended people double their intake of nuts, fruit, vegetables, and legumes, and eat half as much meat and sugar to prevent millions of early deaths, cut greenhouse gas emissions and preserve land, water, and biodiversity.
Contingent on World Bank aid to be given to poorer countries in the wake of coronavirus lockdowns, agri-food conglomerates will aim to further expand their influence. These firms have been integral to the consolidation of a global food regime that has emerged in recent decades based on chemical- and proprietary-input-dependent agriculture which incurs massive externalized social, environmental and health costs.
Reliance on commodity monocropping for global markets, long supply chains and dependency on external inputs for cultivation make the food system vulnerable to shocks, whether resulting from public health scares, oil price spikes (the global food system is fossil-fuel dependent) or conflict and war. An increasing number of countries are recognizing the need to respond by becoming more food self-sufficient, preferably by securing control over their own food and reducing supply chain lengths.
Post comments (0)