MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
According to the World Economic Forum, World Bank and even the UN, we have a technocratic revolution led by AI, robotics and nanotechnology to look forward to. There will be a huge reduction in the need for workers. Scenarios are proposed which anticipate some form of Universal basic income for the unfortunate masses.
From that majority position, it looks like a very gray dystopian future. And maybe that’s what they want.
The people who do not want to be vaccinated against COVID-19 thinking as the worst case scenario. Because there’s something far more sinister embedded within the Great Reset. And that is depopulation.
And by depopulation I mean on a grand scale; perhaps taking the planet’s roster of humans down to around a billion or even 500 million if you want to believe what is etched into the Georgia guide stones.
There is an ugly elephant in the room for most of those who think of the darkest conspiracy theories — that elephant is the possibility that the vaccine is actually going to eventually wipe out some of the population.
It is a scary thought and it is not without precedent.
Are the Technocrats planning on using their vaccines they’ve hyped so relentlessly to vaccinate virtually the entire world’s population? And will the vaccine be programmed to sterilize 60% or more of the women in the world? At this point I think most people would have to sit with that for a while, and this is a terrifying proposition and one that preoccupied the minds of those terrified of getting the mRNA vaccine.
I was reading some material produced by Dr. Mike Yeadon and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg who both warn that the Pfizer vaccine will likely impair our ability to procreate.
According to the literature:
The vaccine contains a spike protein… called syncytin-1, vital for the formation of human placenta in women. If the vaccine works so that we form an immune response AGAINST the spike protein, we are also training the female body to attack syncytin-1, which could lead to infertility in women of an unspecified duration.
Dr. Mike Yeadon and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg are not some fringe medics with pet theories forged in fevered imaginations.
Dr. Yeadon was former Head of Research and vice-president at Pfizer and Dr. Wodarg is an MD, PhD, epidemiologist, lung specialist and former Chairman of the Health Committee of the Council of Europe.
Just imagine how neat that is for their plans. While they have the majority of people terrified they vaccinate them. Still they have no idea what the vaccine does to them — and yet they will get it because they are terrified– social engineering at its darkest — and for those who want population control — very effective.
When it becomes apparent there are far fewer children being born they will have a plan to explain it and from what I have been reading — the population implosion is underway –and while the vaccine is something that may contribute to it — there are plenty of new stories that have been released that are showing that we may be on our way to an unsustainable population.
People know that I am a movie buff– I publishes a science fiction horror fanzine when i was between radio jobs in the 1980’s. Even though I do not publish it now , I still have a love of science fiction especially when it applies to every day life.
As time goes by I have realized that a lot of the science fiction i have enjoyed had created a self-fulfilling prophecy and I tend to wonder if a lot of it creates the revelation of the method or what others call predictive programming.
Movies like, V for Vendetta, for example, was set in the year 2020.
In the film the fascist government that is featured in the film used a pandemic to retain its control over the people.
In the film, a disease known as St. Mary’s Virus has ravaged Europe and killed over 100,000 people as it is revealed in various flash headlines and news reports. It is later revealed that the virus was an act of biological warfare created by members of the government that profited greatly by it and there is even a terrifying moment where people are lined up to receive a vaccine and they all die and are buried in a mass grave.
It is uncanny how the film set the stage for a prophecy that we can see is happening — all that is missing in the prophecy is the idea that people trusting a cure for a plague wound up dying.
Fifteen years ago, there was a film called “Children of Men.”
The film, based on P.D. James’ prophetic 1992 novel, takes place in 2027. Chaos reigns as 20 years of human infertility, followed by the extinction of children, have left civilization in a bleak and hopeless state.
Last year, I brought up the short-lived TV show Utopia in which a coronavirus is killing children. A billionaire Malthusian named Dr. Kevin Christie creates a vaccine that unbeknownst to the population can sterilize three generations of people in order to stop overpopulation.
This is probably why the series was cancelled — the timing of its release and how accurate the show predicted the COVID-19 outbreak– again the plots of these movies and TV shows I cited create a paranoid view of the world.
There is always that fear that the technocrats have no use for people and that they are willing to depopulate the planet by any means necessary.
The question is why all of this science fiction is becoming an accurate depiction of where we are now or where we are heading.
The reason is simple his stuff is built into the structure of the system. It is a standard feature of totalitarian societies, cults, -help groups, and…well, human society, generally.
Being forced to repeat a physical action which only makes sense within a specific ideology reifies that ideology within us. There is nothing inherently diabolical about this. It is a basic socialization technology.
Social engineering can be used for good — but it appears that the destructive side of it is what we are seeing happening now — and from what we can tell it is social engineering that wishes to divide us and, in some cases, kill us off.
The only problem is people are unaware how it can be done — or how it is being done in order to make the planet more manageable,
There is no place for those who think outside the box in New Normal society. The New Normals know this and so do we. To them, we are a suspicious, alien tribe of people. We do not share their ideological beliefs. We do not perform their loyalty rituals, or we do so only grudgingly, because they force us to do so.
They believe that we traffic in arcane “conspiracy theories,” like “pre-March-2020 science,” “natural herd immunity,” “population-adjusted death rates,” “Sweden,” “Florida,” and other heresies.
They do not trust us. We are strangers among them. They suspect we feel superior to them. They believe we are conspiring against them, that we want to deceive them, confuse them, cheat them, pervert their culture, abuse their children, contaminate their precious bodily fluids, and perpetrate God knows what other horrors.
So they are discussing the need to segregate us, how to segregate us, when to segregate us, in order to protect society from us. In their eyes, we are no more than criminals, or, worse, a plague, an infestation.
There are others that have already discussed how one can cancel and eventually do awful things to those who do not necessarily agree with them
This is a no touch war — it is a war of ideologies and eventually the science will turn on all of us and generations will suffer because of these attitudes.
The issue, at the moment, is the Unvaccinated Question, and the public rituals that are being performed to make the New Normal ideology “reality,” and what to do about those of us who refuse to participate in those rituals, who refuse to forswear “old normal” reality and convert to New Normalism so that we can function in society without being segregated, criminalized, or “diagnosed” as “sociopathic” or otherwise psychiatrically disordered.
There are many people who worry that the vaccination may harm them years after it is administered — that perhaps it will drastically alter DNA and that it will affect generations to come.
There are also those that worry and have even theorized that the vaccine will eventually cull thousands of people.
For those that have been called “conspiracy-theorizing reality deniers,” there is no getting around this dilemma.
It is a valid worry as now those that were the experts in epidemiology are now being ushered out and the new experts in genomics are now being appointed to Biden’s health cabinet. The reason is obvious — COVID-19 will no longer be an issue — the reworking of the DNA is now the bigger issue and what it means for generations to come.
That is if there are generations to contend with — we are seeing a decline in new births and this is going to lead to problems with sustaining the population.
Already we are hearing about infertility in males — and while it is not tied to the vaccine, the timing of the announcement echoes back to “The Children of men ” “V for Vendetta” and “Utopia” scenarios.
An environmental medicine professor is sounding the alarm on humanity’s rapidly declining fertility rates — and she says chemicals in plastics are largely to blame.
Shanna Swan, professor of environmental medicine and public health at Mount Sinai’s Icahn School of Medicine in New York City, helped complete a major study in 2017 that discovered sperm count amongst men in Western countries has dropped by more than 50 percent over the past four decades.
Last month, she released her book, Count Down, that dives into how and why humans are losing their ability to procreate.
In the 2017 study published in Human Reproduction Update, researchers discovered that sperm concentration fell from 99 million per ml in 1973 to 47.1 million per ml in 2011. That represents a steep sperm count decline of 53.4% in men in western countries such as Australia, New Zealand, North America, and Europe.
According to Swan, one of the primary drivers are chemicals that “interfere with or mimic the body’s sex hormones.”
“Phthalates, used to make plastic soft and flexible, are of paramount concern,” Swan said. “They are in everybody and we are probably primarily exposed through food as we use soft plastic in food manufacture, processing and packaging.”
She continued, “They lower testosterone and so have the strongest influences on the male side, for example diminishing sperm count, though they are bad for women, too, shown to decrease libido and increase risk of early puberty, premature ovarian failure, miscarriage and premature birth.”
Swan says that the rate of fertility decline isn’t just an odd quirk that can be easily solved with reproductive therapies like in-vitro fertilization. It actually poses an existential threat to humanity. In fact, she projects the world is on track to be completely infertile by 2045.
I know that the ugliest conspiracy theory is the one where it is indicated that the leadership we trust is actually plotting to cull the population– reduce it to manageable number and to do so with plausible deniability.
All the while scientists can tell us that our population implosion is being caused by other means.
Granted; there are plenty of things that can kill you — our environment is toxic enough.
But until now there has never really been a concerted effort to wipe out a substantial amount of the population until now.
Not long ago, there was a paper that was published by the Alliance of World Scientists 11,000 where technocrats signed their names declaring that “the world population must be stabilized and, ideally, gradually reduced,” because a “climate emergency” threatens “the fate of humanity.”
The paper was published in BioScience in 2019 and it reads:
“Still increasing by roughly 80 million people per year or more than 200,000 per day…the world population must be stabilized—and, ideally, gradually reduced—within a framework that ensures social integrity.”
The paper goes on to say:
“There are proven and effective policies that strengthen human rights while lowering fertility rates and lessening the impacts of population growth on GHG emissions and biodiversity loss. These policies make family-planning services available to all people, remove barriers to their access and achieve full gender equity, including primary and secondary education as a global norm for all, especially girls and young women,” they continued, citing a study from John Bongaarts, a population control activist who spoke at the Vatican in 2017.
Demographers for years already been warning Western countries with below replacement-level birth rates about what some call the “demographic winter” or population collapse. In such a collapse, the old outnumber the young, creating severe imbalances. Economies suffer. Some could even crash. The result could negatively impact and could prove detrimental, to some of the main infrastructures such as financial systems and healthcare that contribute to living in a western democracy.
The U.S. birthrate is currently at its lowest in 32 years. Usually, births increase at times of economic stability, so these latest numbers have led demographers to wonder what else is on prospective parents’ minds.
Well, a poll by the Washington Post and the Kaiser Family Foundation in September found that 68 percent of respondents ages 18-29 say they are “afraid” of the effects of climate change, and 63 percent of teen respondents believe future generations will be harmed a great deal.
Many of them have decided that they should not bring children into the world because they see them as a burden on the climate and the planet. For others, the concern is less about what a child might do to the world than about what the world might do to that child.
In more than a dozen interviews with young adults who are wrestling with whether or not to become parents, they all said the question weighed on the minds of their peers. There are Facebook groups dedicated to the subject, online pledges to remain childless until governments take concrete steps to protect the planet, and house parties bringing millennials together to discuss their complicated feelings.
We can again chalk all of this up to social engineering — an agenda that is supposed to reduce the population.
In the academic journal known as “Social Theory and Practice” a memo entitled “Population Engineering and the Fight against Climate Change” by Colin Hickey, Travis N. Rieder, and Jake Earl states clearly the objective of the powers that be and their agenda of population engineering and what it means to everybody.
In the published memo it states:
“There are two important considerations that favor including population engineering as part of the global policy response to the threat of dangerous climate change. First, the current consensus approach to mitigating climate change, which does not include population engineering, falls short of offering a clear and reasonably certain pathway to avoiding dangerous climate change. Second, reducing global population growth over the next century would have a truly massive effect on global Green house Gas emissions.”
Furthermore it says:
“While reducing fertility in developing nations is important, since their per capita GHG emissions are projected to increase significantly (and should be allowed to do so) over the next several decades, it is not nearly as critical as near-term reductions in the numbers of the world’s wealthy. Although it would be difficult to lower the fertility rate in the United States from 1.9 to, say, 1.4, such a reduction would have a massive impact on both near-term and long-term global GHG emissions—much more even than proportionally larger fertility reductions in sub-Saharan Africa.46 But this raises a question: Why bother to reduce fertility in developing nations at all? If the United States and other developed nations are the real problem, then our efforts, surely, ought to focus exclusively on reducing their numbers. But this is also too simplistic. Many of the world’s poor are becoming richer, and all of the rest ought to become richer. That is, it is both descriptively true that many of the world’s poor will have higher per capita GHG emissions as a result of economic development over the next century, and normatively true that they ought to be allowed to develop this way.47 But the details concerning climate change and demographics in the previous sections make clear that Earth cannot sustain a significantly larger population of wealthier individuals.”
And finally, the way to intervene is to use coercion or change the cultural norms regarding having healthy and happy families.
“Sitting to the right of choice-enhancing interventions on the coercion spectrum is a category of interventions aimed at adjusting preferences to encourage people to have fewer children. The policies in this category work by changing cultural norms and influencing individuals’ beliefs and desires, with the ultimate goal of changing procreative behaviors in the direction of lower fertility. These changes could be achieved through mass media such as radio and TV content, billboards, poster campaigns, leaflet distribution, folk theater or other artist sponsorship, campaigns or assemblies in public schools, funding for public lectures, etc.”
There is more, but it is very terrifying; what is equally terrifying is that it appears this agenda is underway, not only do they want fertility rates to plummet, but our life expectancy is also plummeting.
According to the Epoch Times newspaper, life expectancy has fallen for the second time in two years—from a high of 78.9 years in 2014 to 78.6 years in 2016. And it fell across the board — for men and women, whites, blacks, and Hispanics. Statistics show that thousands were preventable, premature deaths.
Life expectancy is not supposed to fall in countries that are this rich, spend this much on health, and pride themselves on taking care of each other.
As we have said population engineering is underway and as it is in print, the physical health of Americans is also being exacerbated by the use of changing cultural norms and influencing individuals’ beliefs and desires, with the ultimate goal of changing population behaviors in the direction of human elimination and death.